Summary Background Virus, host factors and their interplay influence Hepatitis B surface Antigen serum levels during Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infection course and treatment. Aim To study the Pre‐S/S circulating quasispecies in a cohort of untreated, HBeAg negative, genotype‐D, HBsAg carriers. Methods We studied 260 carriers: 71 with HBeAg negative infection (ENI; HBV‐DNA ≤2000 IU/mL); 42 Grey Zone (GZ; HBV‐DNA ≤20 000 IU/mL); 82 chronic hepatitis (CH) and 65 cirrhosis (CI) (HBV‐DNA > 20 000 IU/mL). Population sequencing was applied to identify Pre‐S/S gene mutations responsible for any amino acid substitution or potential biological/antigenic implications (M‐muts) on HBsAg. Results HBsAg serum levels were lower in ENI + GZ than in CH + CI (2.61 [−1.10/4.06] vs 3.62 [2.41/4.92] log 10 IU/mL, P < 0.001) and in CI than CH (3.48 [2.41/4.38] vs 3.66 [2.57/4.92] log 10 IU/mL, P < 0.001). M‐muts were found in 73 (28.1%) cases: 5 (7.0%) ENI, 3 (7.1%) GZ, 26 (31.7%) CH, 39 (60.0%) CI ( P < 0.001) and mostly in Pre‐S2 (17.6%) than Pre‐S1 (5.8%) and Small‐S (10.8%; P < 0.001). Overall HBsAg serum levels were higher in carriers with M‐muts (3.56 [0.95/4.38] vs 3.17 [−1.10/4.92] log 10 IU/mL, P < 0.001), but comparable in carriers with or without M‐mut when considering separately ENI + GZ (2.84 [0.95/3.89] vs 2.61 [−1.10/4.06] log 10 IU/mL, P = 0.330] and CH + CI (3.57 [2.67/4.38] vs 3.63 [2.41/4.92] log 10 IU/mL, P = 0.37). Infection phase ( β : 0.422, P < 0.001), age ( β : −0.260, P < 0.001), ALT ( β : −0.103, P = 0.045), liver stiffness ( β : −0.118, P = 0.039) and HBV‐DNA ( β : 0.384, P < 0.001), but not M‐mut were independently associated with HBsAg serum levels. Conclusions In HBeAg negative, genotype‐D, carriers Pre‐S/S heterogeneity increases with severity of liver disease, but does not influence HBsAg serum levels, that in low viraemic carriers are associated with an effective control of HBV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavallone et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: