This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
To address lane-changing conflicts between intelligent and human-driven vehicles in mixed traffic environments, this study proposes a Stackelberg game-based decision-making method for autonomous vehicles. A Stackelberg game framework is established between autonomous vehicles (leaders) and target-lane human-driven vehicles (followers) in three typical scenarios. The method develops a utility function for human-driven vehicles incorporating driving styles and safety-comfort-efficiency factors, with a corresponding cost function for autonomous vehicles. An improved Stackelberg game model integrates trajectory prediction of human-driven vehicles, while a bi-level optimization algorithm combining model predictive control and genetic algorithms jointly optimizes acceleration sequences and lane-change timing. Simulations demonstrate 60% reduction in heading angle variation and 67.59% decrease in yaw rate compared to non-game strategies, confirming enhanced safety, comfort, and efficiency of the proposed method.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: