Why the study?
Does a community based integrated intervention reduce the annual rate of decline in FEV1 in adults aged 40-89?
Does a community based integrated intervention reduce the annual rate of decline in FEV1 in adults aged 40-89?
A community-based integrated intervention significantly reduced the annual rate of decline in lung function and improved smoking cessation rates over 4 years.
Supports community-based integrated interventions to slow FEV1 decline; extends evidence to objective lung function outcomes in adults 40-89.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a community based integrated intervention for early prevention and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in China. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Eight healthcare units in two communities. PARTICIPANTS: Of 1062 people aged 40-89, 872 (101 with COPD and 771 without COPD) who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were allocated to the intervention or the usual care programmes. INTERVENTION: Participants randomly assigned to integrated intervention (systematic health education, intensive and individualised intervention, treatment, and rehabilitation) or usual care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual rate of decline in forced expiratory rate in one second (FEV(1)) before use of bronchodilator. RESULTS: Annual rate of decline in FEV(1) was significantly lower in the intervention community than the control community, with an adjusted difference of 19 ml/year (95% confidence interval 3 to 36) and 0.9% (0.1% to 1.8%) of predicted values (all P<0.05), as well as a lower annual rate of decline in FEV(1)/FVC (forced vital capacity) ratio (adjusted difference 0.6% (0.1% to 1.2%) P=0.029). There were also higher rates of smoking cessation (21% v 8%, P<0.004) and lower cumulative death rates from all causes (1% v 3%, P<0.009) in the intervention community than in the control community during the four year follow-up. Improvements in knowledge of COPD and smoking hazards, outdoor air quality, environmental tobacco smoke, and working conditions were also achieved (all P<0.05). The difference in cumulative incidence rate of COPD (both around 4%) and cumulative death rate from COPD (2% v 11%) did not reach significance between the two communities. CONCLUSIONS: A community based integrated intervention can have a significant impact on the prevention and management of COPD, mainly reflected in the annual rate of decline in FEV(1). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trials Registration (ChiCTR-TRC-00000532).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: