Why the study?
This expert review describes the current state of gene therapy for SMA, reviews onasemnogene abeparvovec, and discusses future developments and applications.
Does onasemnogene abeparvovec improve survival and motor milestone achievements in presymptomatic infants and patients with SMA type 1?
Does onasemnogene abeparvovec improve survival and motor milestone achievements in presymptomatic infants and patients with SMA type 1?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Onasemnogene abeparvovec is a valuable gene replacement therapy that improves survival and motor milestones in symptomatic infantile SMA and those identified by newborn screening.
Introduction Gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) represents a significant milestone in the treatment of neurologic diseases. SMA is a neurodegenerative disease that results in motor neuron loss because of mutations of the survival motor neuron 1 gene, which directs survival motor neuron (SMN) protein production. Onasemnogene abeparvovec, a one-time gene replacement therapy, delivers a functional transgene to restore SMN protein expression. Onasemnogene abeparvovec has demonstrated improved survival and motor milestone achievements for presymptomatic infants and patients with SMA type 1.Areas covered This expert review describes the current state of gene therapy for SMA, reviews the mechanism of and clinical experience with onasemnogene abeparvovec, explains future efforts to expand applications of gene therapy for SMA, and provides context for developing gene therapy for other conditions.Expert opinion Onasemnogene abeparvovec has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials and, because of this, is a valuable treatment option for patients with symptomatic infantile SMA and those identified by newborn screening. Gene therapy is still in its infancy, and challenges and uncertainties associated with transgene delivery must be addressed. With ongoing development of vector technology, more specific tissue tropism, reduced ‘off-target’ effects, and an enhanced safety profile will continue to evolve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McMillan et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: