Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two bis(triazacyclononane) ligands, 1,3-bis(1,4,7-triaza-1-cyclononyl)-p-xylene (pXTD) and 1,3-bis(1,4,7-triaza-1-cyclononyl)-m-xylene (mXTD), form stable dinuclear Cu(II) complexes (Cu(2)L). At pH 7.3, the predominant species are bis(hydroxide) complexes (Cu(2)L(OH)(2)(2+)) as determined by equilibrium modeling of pH-potentiometric measurements. Several dinuclear and mononuclear Cu(II) complexes and a dinuclear Zn(II) complex promote the hydrolysis of GpppG, a model for the 5'-cap of mRNA. At 0.125 mM complex, both Cu(2)(pXTD) and Cu(2)(mXTD) promote hydrolysis of GpppG approximately 100-fold more rapidly than does the monomeric Cu(TACN) complex (0.250 mM) at pH 7.3 and 37 degrees C (TACN = 1,4,7-triazacyclononane). The dependence of the rate constant on dinuclear Cu(II) complex concentration suggests that Cu(2)(pXTD) promotes hydrolysis through both a 1:1 complex (Cu(2)L-GpppG) and a 2:1 complex ((Cu(2)L)(2)-GpppG). The 2:1 complex is 20-fold more reactive than the 1:1 complex; a first-order rate constant of 1.1 x 10(-)(4) s(-)(1) is determined for hydrolysis of the 2:1 complex. Cu(2)(mXTD) effectively promotes the hydrolysis of GpppG only through a 2:1 complex which hydrolyzes with a first-order rate constant of 4.3 x 10 (-)(5) s(-)(1). Cu(2)(pXTD) binds as a 1:1 complex to m(7)GpppG with a binding constant of 27 000 M(-)(1) as determined by use of fluorescence spectroscopy. Two Cu(2)(mXTD) complexes bind stepwise to m(7)GpppG with binding constants of 5300 and 12 000 M(-)(1) for the first complex and second complex, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCue et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: