Why the study?
Does triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy improve clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with NYHA class III-IV heart failure, LVEF <= 35%, and QRS >= 120 ms?
Does triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy improve clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with NYHA class III-IV heart failure, LVEF <= 35%, and QRS >= 120 ms?
Triple-site cardiac resynchronization therapy is a feasible and safe procedure that may offer high response rates in patients with advanced heart failure.
Triple-site CRT may be feasible with high short-term response; leaves open superiority to standard CRT in randomized trials.
AIMS: To evaluate implantation safety and efficiency of triple-site (double left-single right) cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and to assess the outcome of this procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) < or = 35%, and QRS > or = 120 ms underwent triple-site CRT. Procedural course and complications were analysed. NYHA class, QRS duration, echocardiographic parameters, peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)max), and 6 min walking distance (6MWD) were assessed at baseline and after 3 months. Responders were defined by survival, by no re-hospitalization for heart failure, and by >10% EF, VO(2)max, and 6MWD increase. Implantation was successful in 22 patients (84.6%). Procedure duration (199.1 min) and fluoroscopy time (38.7 min) were higher than in standard procedures. Two clinically silent coronary sinus dissections occurred intra-operatively; one phrenic nerve stimulation and one pocket infection were observed during follow-up. After 3 months of CRT, a significant reduction (P < 0.05) of NYHA class, increment of VO(2)max, 6MWD, EF, and improvement of indices of dyssynchrony were observed. Response rate in the studied group was 95.4%. CONCLUSION: Triple-site resynchronization appears to be a safe and efficient treatment method, with high response rate. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of this pacing mode in CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lenarczyk et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: