Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have demonstrated the induction of suppressor T cells of highly restricted specificity in a nonresponder strain. HEL (hen egg-white lysozyme) fails to elicit an antibody response in C57BL/10 (B10) mice whereas the closely related REL (ring-necked pheasant egg-white lysozyme) is strongly immunogenic. However, an anti-HEL primary antibody response can be obtained in B10 mice in vivo or in vitro by coupling HEL to red blood cells (RBC). Preimmunization with HEL-CFA induced reduction of the anti-HEL PFC response to a subsequent challenge with HEL-RBC. Suppression was demonstrated by in vitro mixing experiments and was mediated with remarkable efficiency by I-J positive suppressor T cells. Suppression was specific for the anti-HEL response and did not affect the anti-RBC response. Both IgM and IgG anti-HEL in vivo antibody responses showed 70 to 80% suppression. Relatively high doses of antigen were required to generate efficient suppression. Optimal suppression was reached within 4 weeks after HEL priming and remained maximal at least 9 weeks after priming. Fine specificity in the expression of suppressive activity was displayed by HEL-specific suppressor cells that were not able to suppress an anti-REL response. Furthermore, REL priming did not suppress an in vitro anti-HEL response to HEL-RBC. The close similarity in amino acid sequence and in B cell cross-reactivity between HEL and REL, contrasted with the lack of REL recognition by HEL-specific suppressor T cells, indicates that a limited region on the nonimmunogenic HEL, absent on REL, can account for the induction of suppression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adorini et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: