To resist = to create? Some thoughts on the concept of resistance in cultural criminology This article provides a theoretical analysis of the label ‘resistance’. It sets out from the premise that the notion of resistance, although it has been current in criminology for some time, is still vaguely defined. We argue that resistance is not just a negative term, but can also be seen as a positive and creative force in society. As such, the primary function of resistance is to serve as a solvent of doxa , to continuously question obviousness and common sense. In the process of resistance we distinguish three processes: invention, imitation and transformation. The third stage warrants deeper investigation within cultural criminology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayward et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: