Why the study?
Do endocannabinoids protect against ventricular fibrillation induced by myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion in rat isolated hearts?
Do endocannabinoids protect against ventricular fibrillation induced by myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion in rat isolated hearts?
Endocannabinoids do not appear to be important endogenous protectants against reperfusion-induced ventricular fibrillation, suggesting CB1 and CB2 receptors are not useful targets for novel anti-VF drugs.
Does not support endocannabinoids as VF protectants in rat hearts; leaves open CB1/CB2 as antiarrhythmic targets.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The hypothesis that endocannabinoids protect hearts against ventricular fibrillation (VF) induced by myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion was examined, and the concept that cannabinoids may represent a new class of anti-VF drug was tested. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In rat isolated hearts (Langendorff perfusion), VF evoked by reperfusion after 60 min regional ischaemia is known to be exacerbated by inhibitors of endogenous protectants such as nitric oxide. This preparation was used to assay the effects of cannabinoid agonists and antagonists, and the protocols were varied to examine mechanisms. KEY RESULTS: Reperfusion-induced VF was not facilitated by relatively selective CB1 (1 μM AM251) or CB2 (1 μM AM630) antagonists. VF evoked during early (30 min) acute ischaemia was also unaffected. However, AM251 significantly increased the incidence of VF and the duration of VF episodes occurring during the later stage of acute ischaemia (30-60 min). AM630 had no such effects. In a separate study, cannabinoid perfusion (anandamide or 2-arachidonoylglycerol, both 0.01-1 μM) failed to reduce VF incidence concentration-dependently during 30 min ischaemia. In all these studies, changes in ancillary variables (QT, PR, heart rate) were unrelated to changes in VF. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Endocannabinoids are not endogenous anti-VF mediators during reperfusion, but may have a weak protective effect during the late stages of ischaemia, mediated via CB1 agonism. This does not suggest endocannabinoids are important endogenous protectants in these settings, or that CB1 (or CB2) receptors are useful novel targets for developing drugs for VF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrag et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: