Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the nicotine pharmacokinetics of a commercial electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) relative to conventional cigarettes in Chinese adult smokers. AIMS AND METHODS: A randomized, open-label, crossover clinical study was conducted on 23 healthy adult Chinese smokers. In two sessions, subjects used either the e-cigarettes with 30 mg/g nicotine in e-liquid or conventional cigarettes of a given brand, at one puff every 30 seconds for a total of 10 puffs. Blood samples were collected at specified time points for 4 hours after the first puff. Subjective effects on desire-to-smoke and physiological parameters such as heart rate and oxyhemoglobin saturation levels were also examined before and after using the two products. RESULTS: The baseline-adjusted maximum nicotine concentration (Cmax-BL), time-to-peak nicotine concentration (Tmax), and nicotine absorption rate (Cmax-BL divided by Tmax) were found to be similar for the e-cigarette versus those of conventional cigarettes (p > .05). Total nicotine exposure measured as the area-under-curve (AUC0-t-BL) was significantly lower for the e-cigarette relative to that of conventional cigarettes. In addition, the subjects found that e-cigarettes were well tolerated under controlled puffing conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The test e-cigarettes achieved similar nicotine delivery and pharmacokinetic profiles to those of the comparator cigarettes, indicating that this e-cigarette could be a potential alternative to conventional cigarettes for those adult smokers. IMPLICATIONS: There are no data in the published literature on the nicotine pharmacokinetics of e-cigarettes in Chinese smokers. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the nicotine delivery and pharmacokinetic profile of a commercial e-cigarette brand compared with conventional cigarettes in Chinese adult smokers. After the use of test e-cigarettes, nicotine delivery and pharmacokinetic profile were similar to those of conventional cigarettes in Chinese adult smokers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: