Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective To assess the role of point‐of‐care (PoC) assessment of C‐reactive protein ( CRP ) and white blood cell ( WBC ) count to identify bacterial illness in Tanzanian children with non‐severe non‐malarial fever. Methods From the outpatient department of a district hospital in Tanzania, 428 patients between 3 months and 5 years of age who presented with fever and a negative malaria test were enrolled. All had a physical examination and bacterial cultures from blood and urine. Haemoglobin, CRP and WBC were measured by PoC devices. Results Positive blood cultures were detected in 6/428 (1.4%) children and urine cultures were positive in 24/401 (6.0%). Mean WBC was similar in children with or without bacterial illness (14.0 × 10 9 , 95% CI 12.0–16.0 × 109 vs . 12.0 × 10 9 , 95% CI 11.4–12.7 × 109), while mean CRP was higher in children with bacterial illness (41.0 mg/l, 95% CI 28.3–53.6 vs . 23.8 mg/l, 95% CI 17.8–27.8). In ROC analysis, the optimum cut‐off value for CRP to identify bacterial illness was 19 mg/l but with an area under the curve of only 0.62. Negative predictive values exceeded 80%, while positive predictive values were under 40%. Conclusion WBC and CRP levels had limited value in identifying children with bacterial infections. The positive predictive values for both tests were too low to be used as single tools for treatment decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hildenwall et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: