Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
The authors call for a controlled study to compare the antiplatelet activity and gastrointestinal safety profile of COX-1 NSAIDs versus aspirin.
The cardioprotective/platelet inhibitory role of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been controversial, perhaps in contrast to the accepted prophylactic role of aspirin (114). That cardioprotective effect is attributed to the platelet aggregation inhibitory effects of aspirin and COX 1 active NSAIDS (10, 11, 13) and can be studied without requirement for massive numbers of patients. Such cardioprotection, however, has its own risks. Significant gastrointestinal toxicity is still present with the 75-81 mg aspirin dose and appears no less than that found with the higher doses once routinely utilized in treatment of arthritis (2, 8, 9). One study even reported that 4% of patients receiving aspirin had moderate to severe bleeding (14). The challenge with aspirin is that even with a 75 mg dose, the frequency of severe gastrointestinal hemorrhage is double that of placebo (2, 8, 9) and not different from that observed with COX 1 NSAIDs, in the abse
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruce M. Rothschild (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: