Why the study?
Does exercise treadmill testing accurately detect coronary plaque or stenosis compared to cardiac computed tomography angiography in patients presenting to the emergency room with acute chest pain?
Does exercise treadmill testing accurately detect coronary plaque or stenosis compared to cardiac computed tomography angiography in patients presenting to the emergency room with acute chest pain?
In low- to intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain, ETT has low sensitivity but high specificity for detecting >50% stenosis by CTA, suggesting young patients or those with high exercise capacity may benefit from initial ETT instead of CTA.
Low sensitivity limits ETT rule-out utility in acute chest pain; leaves open selective use in high-exercise-capacity patients pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: The aims of our study were to (1) examine how data from exercise treadmill testing (ETT) can identify patients who have coronary plaque or stenosis, using CT angiography (CTA) as the reference standard, and (2) identify patient characteristics that may be used in selecting ETT versus CTA. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Rule Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computer-Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) trial was an observational cohort study of acute chest pain patients presenting to the emergency department with normal initial troponin and a nonischemic ECG. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the relationship of baseline clinical data and ETT parameters with coronary plaque and stenosis on CTA. Of the 220 patients who had ETT (mean age, 51 years; 63% men), 21 (10%) had positive results. A positive ETT had a sensitivity of 30% and specificity of 93% to detect >50% stenosis. The sensitivity increased to 83% after excluding uninterpretable segments and evaluating the ability to detect a >70% stenosis. Predictors of plaque included older age, male sex, diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, lower functional capacity, and a lower Duke Treadmill Score. Both a positive ETT and a low Duke Treadmill Score were significant univariate and multivariable predictors of stenosis >50% on CTA Whereas the prevalence of stenosis by CTA was greater among patients with more risk factors, coronary stenosis was not present among men <40 years old or women <50 years old or individuals who achieved at least 13 metabolic equivalents on ETT. CONCLUSIONS: Among low- to intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain, a positive ETT has a limited sensitivity but high specificity for the detection of >50% stenosis by CTA. Although patients with a high number of clinical risk factors are more likely to have obstructive coronary artery disease, those who are young or who would be expected to have a very high exercise capacity are unlikely to have coronary stenosis and therefore may benefit from initial ETT testing instead of CTA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blankstein et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: