Why the study?
Can left ventricular diastolic function be accurately evaluated by measuring fractional area change using cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to echocardiography?
Can left ventricular diastolic function be accurately evaluated by measuring fractional area change using cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to echocardiography?
Fractional area change measured by cine CMR is a feasible and effective method for evaluating left ventricular diastolic function, correlating well with traditional echocardiographic parameters.
Supports CMR diastolic assessment as feasible alternative; hypothesis-generating pending outcome validation.
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is essential for the management of heart failure. We verified whether LV diastolic function could be evaluated by measuring the fractional area change (FAC) using cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS: We collected clinical data from 59 patients who underwent echocardiography and cine CMR. Normal, impaired relaxation, pseudonormal, and restrictive LV filling were observed in 15, 28, 11, and 5 patients, respectively. We calculated FAC during the first 30% of diastole (diastolic-index%) in the short-axis view, by tracing the contours on only three MR cine images. RESULTS: The diastolic index was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in patients with impaired relaxation (32.4 ± 7.5), pseudonormal filling (25.4 ± 5.6), and restrictive filling (9.5 ± 1.5) compared to those with normal diastolic function (67.7 ± 10.8), and the index decreased significantly with worsening of diastolic dysfunction. The diastolic index correlated positively with early diastolic mitral annular velocity measured by tissue Doppler imaging (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of FAC can be useful for the evaluation of LV diastolic function using cine CMR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okayama et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: