Why the study?
Does non-Caucasian ethnicity reduce the likelihood of new antidepressant medication use compared to Caucasian ethnicity in US adults?
Does non-Caucasian ethnicity reduce the likelihood of new antidepressant medication use compared to Caucasian ethnicity in US adults?
Non-Caucasian US adults have significantly lower rates of new antidepressant medication use compared to Caucasians, even after adjusting for baseline depression and loss to follow-up.
May indicate ethnic disparities in ADM access; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
INTRODUCTION: There is evidence that the utilization of antidepressant medications (ADM) may vary between different ethnic groups in the United States population. METHODS: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) is a population-based prospective cohort study of 6814 US adults from 4 different ethnic groups. After excluding baseline users of ADM, we examined the relation between baseline depression and new use of ADM for 4 different ethnicities: African-Americans (n = 1822), Asians (n = 784) Caucasians (n = 2300), and Hispanics (n = 1405). Estimates of the association of ethnicity and ADM use were adjusted for age, study site, gender, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), alcohol use, smoking, blood pressure, diabetes, education, and exercise. Non-random loss to follow-up was present and estimates were adjusted using inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW). RESULTS: Of the four ethnicities, Caucasian participants had the highest rate of ADM use (12%) compared with African-American (4%), Asian (2%), and Hispanic (6%) participants. After adjustment, non-Caucasian ethnicity was associated with reduced ADM use: African-American (HR: 0.42; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.31-0.58), Asian (HR: 0.14; 95%CI: 0.08-0.26), and Hispanic (HR: 0.47; 95%CI: 0.31-0.65). Applying IPCW to correct for non-random loss to follow-up among the study participants weakened but did not eliminate these associations: African-American (HR: 0.48; 95%CI: 0.30-0.57), Asian (HR: 0.23; 95%CI: 0.13-0.37), and Hispanic (HR: 0.58; 95%CI: 0.47-0.67). CONCLUSION: Non-Caucasian ethnicity is associated with lower rates of new ADM use. After IPCW adjustment, the observed ethnicity differences in ADM use are smaller although still statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Delaney et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: