Why the study?
Hypertension is a major disease and economic burden, and early detection through screening may reduce morbidity and mortality, but the cost-effectiveness of dental-care screening was unknown.
Is an opportunistic hypertension screening programme in a dental-care facility cost-effective compared to care as usual in healthy individuals aged 40-75?
Is an opportunistic hypertension screening programme in a dental-care facility cost-effective compared to care as usual in healthy individuals aged 40-75?
Opportunistic hypertension screening in dental clinics is unlikely to be cost-effective in countries with well-developed healthcare systems and low hypertension prevalence.
Unlikely cost-effective long-term at ~2.2M SEK/QALY; leaves open targeted screening value in higher-prevalence settings.
BACKGROUND: Hypertension is one of the largest contributors to the disease burden and a major economic challenge for health-care systems. Early detection of persons with high blood pressure can be achieved through screening and has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an opportunistic hypertension screening programme in a dental-care facility for individuals aged 40-75 in comparison to care as usual (the no-screening baseline scenario). METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was carried out from the payer and societal perspectives, and the short-term (from screening until diagnosis has been established) cost per identified case of hypertension and long-term (20 years) cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) were reported. Data on the short-term cost were based on a real-world screening programme in which 2025 healthy individuals were screened for hypertension. Data on the long-term cost were based on the short-term outcomes combined with modelling in a Markov cohort model. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to assess uncertainty. RESULTS: The short-term analysis showed an additional cost of 4,800 SEK (€470) per identified case of hypertension from the payer perspective and from the societal perspective 12,800 SEK (€1,240). The long-term analysis showed a payer cost per QALY of 2.2 million SEK (€210,000) and from the societal perspective 2.8 million SEK per QALY (€270,000). CONCLUSION: The long-term model results showed that the screening model is unlikely to be cost-effective in a country with a well-developed health-care system and a relatively low prevalence of hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersson et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: