Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Environmental studies conducted worldwide often overlook the knowledge traditions of the locales where they are conducted. Addressing this issue, I investigated the geographic journal literature of late Soviet (1980–1989) and post‐Soviet (1990–2003) Russia. Notable trends are increasing criticism of environmental and resource management in Russia and a (re)turn to pre‐socialist Russian theorizations of society–nature interactions. Specifically, the noösphere, ethnogenesis and geosystems are trends in the literature that signify how Russian geographers (re)construct environmental knowledge. For non‐Russian geographers working in Russia, awareness of these trends situates place‐based knowledge relative to multiple cultures (ethnic, scientific) and time periods, promoting cross‐cultural understanding of different traditions of geographic inquiry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jessica K. Graybill (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: