Key result
Mini-BESTest shows ~12 percentage points higher sensitivity than Berg Balance Scale in post-stroke walking assessment.
Observational (n=41)
p-value: p=0.003
BACKGROUND: The Mini-BESTest is a recently developed balance assessment tool that incorporates challenging dynamic balance tasks. Few studies have compared the psychometric properties of the Mini-BESTest to the commonly used Berg Balance Scale (BBS). However, the utility of these scales in relationship to post stroke walking speeds has not been explored. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Mini-BESTest and BBS to evaluate walking speeds in individuals with stroke. DESIGN: A retrospective exploratory design. METHODS: Forty-one individuals with chronic stroke were evaluated with the Mini-BESTest, BBS, and 10-meter self-selected walk test (10MWT). Based on their self-selected gait speeds (below or above 0.8 m/s), participants were classified as slow and fast walkers. RESULTS: Significant linear correlations were observed between the Mini-BESTest vs. BBS (r = 0.72, p ≤ 0.001), Mini-BESTest vs. 10MWT (r = 0.58, p ≤ 0.001), and BBS vs. 10MWT (r = 0.30, p = 0.05). Independent t-tests comparing the balance scores for the slow and fast walkers revealed significant group differences for the Mini-BESTest (p = 0.003), but not for the BBS (p = 0.09). The Mini-BESTest demonstrated higher sensitivity (93%) and specificity (64%) compared to the BBS (sensitivity 81%, specificity 56%) for discriminating participants into slow and fast walkers. CONCLUSIONS: The Mini-BESTest has a greater discriminative ability than the BBS to categorize individuals with stroke into slow and fast walkers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madhavan et al. (2017) conducted an observational in chronic stroke (n=41). Mini-Balance Evaluations Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) vs. Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was evaluated on Discriminative ability for categorizing slow (<0.8 m/s) and fast (≥0.8 m/s) walkers (p=0.003). The Mini-BESTest demonstrated higher sensitivity (93% vs 81%) and specificity (64% vs 56%) compared to the Berg Balance Scale for discriminating slow and fast walkers post-stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: