Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large deviations from "cubic‐law" dependence of laminar fluid flow through fractures on the apparent mechanical aperture of a fracture can be explained by assuming: 1) cubic‐law dependence of flow on the actual local aperture at the microscopic level; 2) conservation of rock volume when deforming the fracture; and 3) macroscopic flow properties are dominated by the critical neck (the smallest aperture along the path of highest aperture through the fracture).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyrak‐Nolte et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: