Why the study?
The test-retest reliability of single-breath lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) and carbon monoxide (DLCO) during exercise required evaluation.
Does single-breath lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) demonstrate test-retest reliability during light to moderate intensity cycling exercise in healthy subjects?
Does single-breath lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) demonstrate test-retest reliability during light to moderate intensity cycling exercise in healthy subjects?
Single-breath DLNO demonstrates excellent test-retest reliability during moderate intensity exercise, though patient breathlessness may limit its application at higher intensities.
Supports feasibility of DLNO-DLCO testing during exercise in healthy adults; leaves open reliability and utility in cardiopulmonary disease.
This study examined test-retest reliability of single-breath lung diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) and carbon monoxide (DLCO) during exercise. Sixteen healthy subjects (age 20–67 years) performed DLNO-DLCO tests during light and moderate intensity cycling exercise at 50% and 80% of individual anaerobic threshold (IAT). Primary endpoint was DLNO at 80% IAT. Precision of DLNO, DLCO, and alveolar volume was quantified by within-subject standard deviation (SDws, measurement error) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Reproducibility was determined by SDws* 2.77. Overall, reliability was excellent for all outcomes. SDws and reproducibility for DLNO at 80% IAT were 4.6 and 12.7 mL.min−1.mmHg−1, and the ICC was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.98–0.99). Median breathlessness at 80% IAT was 4 (interquartile range 3–6) on a 0–10 scale. Our data suggest excellent reliability of single-breath DLNO during moderate intensity exercise, but perceived levels of breathlessness may limit its usefulness, especially at exercise intensities beyond IAT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alves et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: