Why the study?
Is inadequate improvement in heart rate variability associated with left ventricular remodeling in patients with reperfused first anterior acute myocardial infarction?
Is inadequate improvement in heart rate variability associated with left ventricular remodeling in patients with reperfused first anterior acute myocardial infarction?
Persistently reduced heart rate variability during the healing stage of acute myocardial infarction is associated with postinfarction left ventricular remodeling.
May link inadequate HRV recovery to LV remodeling post-anterior MI; hypothesis-generating, needs prospective trials before practice change.
The aim of the present study was to test the hypothesis that inadequate improvement in heart rate variability (HRV) in the healing stage of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with left ventricular (LV) remodeling. The study group comprised 20 patients (14 men, 6 women; mean age, 61+/-12 years) with a reperfused first anterior AMI (</=24 h). The standard deviation of normal RR intervals (SDNN) was calculated from the 24-h ambulatory electrocardiogram recorded on day 3 of admission and at predischarge from the hospital. Left ventriculography was performed immediately after primary angioplasty and at predischarge. The change in SDNN (deltaSDNN) was compared with the change in the LV end-systolic volume index (deltaLVESVI), a parameter of LV remodeling. SDNN increased from 73+/-19 ms on day 3 to 109+/-35 ms at predischarge (p=0.0003). SDNN at predicharge and deltaSDNN correlated negatively with deltaLVESVI (r=-0.52, p=0.02, and r=-0.61, p=0.004, respectively), whereas SDNN on day 3 did not correlate with deltaLVESVI. Multiple regression analysis selected deltaLVESVI (p=0.02) as an independent factor of deltaSDNN. This study indicates that deltaSDNN and SDNN at predicharge are associated with deltaLVESVI in patients with a reperfused first anterior wall AMI, indicating that persistently reduced HRV is associated with postinfarction LV remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abe et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: