Why the study?
Athletes often return to sport before recovering upper extremity strength after shoulder stabilization surgery, and blood flow restriction may stimulate muscle growth without heavy resistance training.
Does blood flow restriction therapy improve shoulder strength and function in military cadets recovering from shoulder stabilization surgery?
Does blood flow restriction therapy improve shoulder strength and function in military cadets recovering from shoulder stabilization surgery?
Six weeks of blood flow restriction training added to standard rehabilitation post-shoulder stabilization surgery resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in strength and self-reported function.
BFR may support strength recovery after shoulder stabilization; leaves open efficacy for return-to-sport in controlled trials.
Background Traumatic shoulder instability is a common injury in athletes and military personnel. Surgical stabilization reduces recurrence, but athletes often return to sport before recovering upper extremity rotational strength and sport-specific abilities. Blood flow restriction (BFR) may stimulate muscle growth without the need for heavy resistance training post-surgically. Hypothesis/Purpose To observe changes in shoulder strength, self-reported function, upper extremity performance, and range of motion (ROM) in military cadets recovering from shoulder stabilization surgery who completed a standard rehabilitation program with six weeks of BFR training. Study Design Prospective case series Methods Military cadets who underwent shoulder stabilization surgery completed six weeks of upper extremity BFR training, beginning post-op week six. Primary outcomes were shoulder isometric strength and patient-reported function assessed at 6-weeks, 12-weeks, and 6-months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included shoulder ROM assessed at each timepoint and the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST), the Upper Extremity Y-Balance Test (UQYBT), and the Unilateral Seated Shotput Test (USPT) assessed at the six-month follow-up. Results Twenty cadets performed an average 10.9 BFR training sessions over six weeks. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful increases in surgical extremity external rotation strength ( p < 0.001; mean difference, .049; 95% CI: .021, .077), abduction strength ( p < 0.001; mean difference, .079; 95% CI: .050, .108), and internal rotation strength ( p < 0.001; mean difference, .060; CI: .028, .093) occurred from six to 12 weeks postoperatively. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were reported on the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation ( p < 0.001; mean difference, 17.7; CI: 9.4, 25.9) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index ( p < 0.001; mean difference, -31.1; CI: -44.2, -18.0) from six to 12 weeks postoperatively. Additionally, over 70 percent of participants met reference values on two to three performance tests at 6-months. Conclusion While the degree of improvement attributable to the addition of BFR is unknown, the clinically meaningful improvements in shoulder strength, self-reported function, and upper extremity performance warrant further exploration of BFR during upper extremity rehabilitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGinniss et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: