A useful alternative to the traditional water caloric is to use an air stimulus. However, the caloric test has not been standardized and a range of parameters are being used in different audiology clinics. The aim of this study was to determine cold air parameters that resulted in a similar slow-component eye velocity to that for water irrigation. Twelve normal subjects underwent caloric testing using air temperatures in the range 18-33 degrees C. The duration and air-flow rate were held constant at 60 s and 5 l/min. A water irrigation at 30 degrees C for 30 s and delivering 150 ml resulted in a mean slow-component eye velocity of 17 degrees/s. An equal response was obtained with an air temperature of 21.0 degrees C. Further work is required to find equivalent air and water responses for other combinations of parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munro et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: