Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CT stent imaging suffers from blooming and metal artifacts, reducing the diagnostic quality of images in the areas around stents. Photon-counting detectors (PCDs) have been shown to reduce these artifacts. Two clinical scanners, a GE Optima 580 and Discovery IQ, were compared to a bench-top PCD-CT system for stent imaging with three stents: 1) Medtronic Protégé; 2) Cordis Precise; and 3) Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control. The apparent strut thickness, lumen diameter, and lumen attenuation of the stents were evaluated in reconstructed images.K-edge images were also reconstructed to demonstrate more accurate delineation of the tantalum radiopaque markers. PCD-CT offered lower percent differences for strut thickness for all three stents (p < 0.001) and for lumen diameter for the Protégé and Precise stents (p < 0.01). The lumen attenuation was more accurate with PCD-CT as well (p < 0.01), excluding the comparisons between the Optima 580 and PCD-CT for the Protégé and Precise stents. The PCD-CT system was better able to delineate stents, specifically strut thickness. The stents were more easily distinguished in PCD-CT images and in 3-D volume renderings than the clinical systems. The tantalum radiopaque markers were clearly visible in K-edge images due to reduced metal artifacts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richtsmeier et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: