Why the study?
Sex and gender differences in presentation and characteristics of OHCA are established in presumed cardiac aetiology but not non-cardiac etiology.
Does female sex affect the incidence and survival to hospital discharge in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared to male sex?
Does female sex affect the incidence and survival to hospital discharge in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest compared to male sex?
Sex differences in OHCA incidence and outcomes appear driven by differences in susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias and underlying etiology rather than treatment disparities.
Sex differences in OHCA survival vanish after adjustment for etiology and rhythm; leaves open whether sex-specific interventions improve outcomes in observational cohorts.
Introduction: Sex and gender differences in presentation and characteristics of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are established in cohorts with presumed cardiac aetiology but not non-cardiac etiology. This study investigated the effect of sex on incidence and outcome of OHCA according to presumed and adjudicated aetiology within a local health network. Methods: Population-based observational cohort study of emergency medical services (EMS) attended OHCAs within an Australian local health network. Cases identified from an EMS registry between 2012-2016 were linked to a hospital registry. Age-standardised incidence and baseline characteristics were stratified by sex for EMS-treated OHCA, non-EMS witnessed presumed cardiac and obvious non-cardiac sub-cohorts, and hospitalised cases. Logistic regression was used to explore the primary outcome of survival to hospital discharge. Results: We identified 2,024 EMS-attended and 780 EMS-treated OHCAs. The non-EMS witnessed sub-cohorts comprised 504 presumed cardiac and 168 obvious non-cardiac OHCAs. Adjudicated aetiology was recorded in 123 hospitalised cases. Age-standardised incidence for women was almost half that of men across all groups. Across cohorts, women were generally older and arrested with a non-shockable initial rhythm in an area of low socioeconomic status. There was no sex difference in the primary outcome for the main EMS-treated cohort or in the non-cardiac sub-cohorts. The sex difference in outcome in the presumed cardiac sub-cohort was not present after multivariable adjustment. Conclusions: There are sex differences in incidence and outcome of EMS-treated OHCA that appear to be driven by differences in susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias and underlying etiology, rather than treatment delays or disparities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wittwer et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: