Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of cancer associated with modern primary metal-on-metal hip replacements. DESIGN: Population based study. SETTING: Nationwide retrospective comparative register. PARTICIPANTS: 10,728 patients who underwent metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 18,235 patients who underwent conventional metal-on-polyethylene, ceramic-on-polyethylene, and ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (the non-metal-on-metal cohort) in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register 2001-10. Data on cancer cases up to 2010 for these cohorts were extracted from the Finnish Cancer Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relative risk of cancer was expressed as the ratio of observed to expected number of cases from the Finnish population--that is, the standardised incidence ratio. The relative risk of cancer in the metal-on-metal cohort compared with the non-metal-on-metal cohort was estimated with analyses of these ratios and Poisson regression. RESULTS: The overall risk of cancer in patients with metal-on-metal hip implants was similar to that in the Finnish population (378 observed v 400 expected, standardised incidence ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.04). The overall risk of cancer in patients with metal-on-metal hip implants was also no higher than in patients who had received non-metal-on-metal hip implants (relative risk 0.92, 0.81 to 1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Metal-on-metal hip replacements are not associated with an increased overall risk of cancer during a mean follow-up of four years.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mäkelä et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: