Why the study?
Hemodynamic diagnosis indexes evaluate cardiovascular health, but the accuracy of current non-invasive detection remains unsatisfactory.
Does a non-invasive hemodynamic diagnosis model based on non-linear pulse wave theory accurately estimate blood flow and hemodynamic indexes compared to clinical values?
Does a non-invasive hemodynamic diagnosis model based on non-linear pulse wave theory accurately estimate blood flow and hemodynamic indexes compared to clinical values?
A novel algorithmic model based on non-linear pulse wave theory applied to four limbs can accurately estimate hemodynamic indexes, potentially facilitating non-invasive cardiovascular diagnosis.
May aid non-invasive CVS assessment in older adults; leaves open validation before clinical use.
Introduction: Hemodynamic diagnosis indexes (HDIs) can comprehensively evaluate the health status of the cardiovascular system (CVS), particularly for people older than 50 years and prone to cardiovascular disease (CVDs). However, the accuracy of non-invasive detection remains unsatisfactory. We propose a non-invasive HDIs model based on the non-linear pulse wave theory (NonPWT) applied to four limbs. Methods: This algorithm establishes mathematical models, including pulse wave velocity and pressure information of the brachial and ankle arteries, pressure gradient, and blood flow. Blood flow is key to calculating HDIs. Herein, we derive blood flow equation for different times of the cardiac cycle considering the four different distributions of blood pressure and pulse wave of four limbs, then obtain the average blood flow in a cardiac cycle, and finally calculate the HDIs. Results: The results of the blood flow calculations reveal that the average blood flow in the upper extremity arteries is 10.78 ml/s (clinically: 2.5–12.67 ml/s), and the blood flow in the lower extremity arteries is higher than that in the upper extremity. To verify model accuracy, the consistency between the clinical and calculated values is verified with no statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05). Model IV or higher-order fitting is the closest. To verify the model generalizability, considering the risk factors of cardiovascular diseases, the HDIs are recalculated using model IV, and thus, consistency is verified ( p < 0.05 and Bland-Altman plot). Conclusion: We conclude our proposed algorithmic model based on NonPWT can facilitate the non-invasive hemodynamic diagnosis with simpler operational procedures and reduced medical costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: