Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, unprecedented bulk measurements of ice water content (IWC) up to approximately 5 g m −3 and 95-GHz radar reflectivities Z 95 are used to analyze the statistical relationship between these two quantities and its variability. The unique aspect of this study is that these IWC– Z 95 relationships do not use assumptions on cloud microphysics or backscattering calculations. IWCs greater than 2 g m −3 are also included for the first time in such an analysis, owing to improved bulk IWC probe technology and a flight program targeting high ice water content. Using a single IW– Z 95 relationship allows for the retrieval of IWC from radar reflectivities with less than 30% bias and 40%–70% rms difference. These errors can be reduced further, down to 10%–20% bias over the whole IWC range, using the temperature variability of this relationship. IWC errors largely increase for Z 95 > 16 dB Z , as a result of the distortion of the IWC– Z 95 relationship by non-Rayleigh scattering effects. A nonlinear relationship is proposed to reduce these errors down to 20% bias and 20%–35% rms differences. This nonlinear relationship also outperforms the temperature-dependent IWC– Z 95 relationship for convective profiles. The joint frequency distribution of IWC and temperature within and around deep tropical convective cores shows that at the −50° ± 5°C level, the cruise altitude of many commercial jet aircraft, IWCs greater than 1.5 g m −3 were found exclusively in convective profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Protat et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: