Why the study?
Does PEP-derived MPI correlate with the classic Tei index for evaluating left ventricular function in hypertensive patients with sinus rhythm?
Does PEP-derived MPI correlate with the classic Tei index for evaluating left ventricular function in hypertensive patients with sinus rhythm?
PEP-derived MPI is strongly correlated with the classic Tei index and can be used as an alternative echocardiographic parameter to evaluate left ventricular function in hypertensive patients.
PEP-derived MPI correlates with Tei index in hypertension; leaves open routine substitution pending prospective validation.
The goal of this study was to evaluate the preejection time (PEP)-derived myocardial performance index (MPI) in hypertensive (HT) patients with sinus rhythm and its relationship to the classic Tei index. One hundred five patients were enrolled in the study (65 HT and 40 control subjects). The mean age of all patients was 50.5 ± 15 years and 60% were female. Echocardiography was performed on all patients. MPI was measured with the classic Tei method (MPI-Tei index) and the PEP-derived MPI method by using tissue Doppler echocardiography. Although the MPI-Tei index is defined as the ratio of isovolumetric contraction time (IVCT) along with isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT) to ejection time (ET), PEP-derived MPI is defined as the ratio of PEP and IVRT to ET. We compared echocardiographic data between the HT group and the control group. MPI-Tei index and the PEP-derived MPI values were higher in the HT group compared with controls (0.52 ± 0.10 vs 0.39 ± 0.07, P < 0.001, and 0.51 ± 0.09 vs 0.39 ± 0.07). PEP-derived MPI was strongly correlated with the MPI-Tei index (r = 0.945, P < 0.001). Our study determined that the PEP-derived MPI might be used in the evaluation of left ventricular function in patients with HT, similar to the classic MPI-Tei index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beşli et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: