Why the study?
Although Japanese guidelines recommend combination therapy for PAH, real-world data show inconsistencies in its implementation.
Does treatment at PAH-specialized centers compared to non-specialized centers increase the utilization of intensive PAH therapies such as parenteral infusions and combination regimens in Japan?
Does treatment at PAH-specialized centers compared to non-specialized centers increase the utilization of intensive PAH therapies such as parenteral infusions and combination regimens in Japan?
Real-world data reveals significant practice gaps in PAH management in Japan, where specialized centers are far more likely to employ guideline-recommended intensive treatments like parenteral infusions and combination therapies than non-specialized centers.
Survey reveals inconsistent PAH combination therapy use in Japan; leaves open need for targeted implementation studies.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease characterized by remodeling of the pulmonary vasculature, which leads to increased pulmonary artery pressure and ultimately right ventricular failure. Although Japanese guidelines recommend combination therapy, real‐world data show inconsistencies in its implementation. We thus conducted a cross‐sectional, web‐based questionnaire survey to understand the recent real‐world clinical practices in Japan and identify factors associated with treatment decisions, with a particular focus on the use of combination therapies. The findings indicated that oral PAH medications were widely available and commonly prescribed, whereas inhaled and parenteral infusion therapy were less accessible and used less frequently. Moreover, physicians working in PAH‐specialized centers were significantly more likely to prescribe parenteral infusion therapies (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5–4.3, p < 0.001) and adopt dual (aOR = 3.0, 95% CI: 1.4–6.5, p = 0.01) or triple combination regimens (aOR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.5–2.7, p < 0.001). Physicians with experience treating high risk patients at PAH‐specialized centers were also significantly more likely to prescribe parenteral infusion therapies (aOR = 3.5, 95% CI: 1.8–6.6, p < 0.001) and adopt dual (aOR = 5.9, 95% CI: 2.5–14.2, p < 0.001) or triple combination regimens (aOR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.7–6.7, p < 0.001). This study revealed differences in clinical practice between PAH‐specialized and non‐specialized centers in real‐world settings. Management of PAH at PAH‐specialized centers was associated with increased treatment intensification, indicating the need for enhanced collaboration between PAH‐specialized and non‐specialized centers to ensure optimal care for patients with PAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: