Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates the effects of rotational speed on mixing and breakage in non-spherical particles, suggesting a robust modeling framework.
• The multi-superquadric model with separation function is first developed. • The transient particle breakage rate is largely affected by rotational speed. • The movements of multi-superquadric and single particles are firstly co-integrated. • The multi-superquadric model can be further coupled with CFD-DEM framework. Non-spherical particles are widely encountered in engineering applications, yet their irregular shapes pose challenges for accurate modelling in the discrete element method (DEM) framework. This study develops a novel multi-superquadric particle model that incorporates both combination and separation operations for sub-particles, enabling the simulation of non-spherical particle breakage under specific trigger conditions. For the first time, the coexistence of intact multi-superquadric particles and their sub-particles post-separation is implemented within a unified computational domain while maintaining continuous motion integration. The combination sub-model is validated against experimental data and applied to investigate the effects of rotational speed on particle mixing in a horizontal drum. Additionally, the breakage sub-model is applied to investigate the particle breakage behaviors, according to the experimentally determined force-based binary (yes/no) decision criterion. The results show that rotational speed significantly influences the velocity distribution of multi-superquadric particles. A twofold increase in rotational speed (from 25 rpm to 50 rpm) reduces the mixing time by approximately 50 % and increases the transient breakage rate by 1.75 times. This study provides a robust modelling framework for analyzing complex non-spherical particle systems, offering new insights into particle breakage mechanisms and their impact on granular flows in industrial processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: