Why the study?
Does the timing of endosaccular coil embolization affect procedural morbidity and 6-month outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Population
327 patients consecutively treated for ruptured intracranial aneurysms by coil embolization within 30 days…
Comparison
Endosaccular coil embolization performed at… vs Comparison between three timing groups: Group 1…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
6 months
Authors
Loading...
Timing of coil embolization was not associated with morbidity or outcomes; leaves open whether early intervention safely prevents rerupture.
Does the timing of endosaccular coil embolization affect procedural morbidity and 6-month outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
The timing of endovascular coil embolization after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage does not significantly affect periprocedural morbidity or 6-month clinical outcomes, supporting early intervention to prevent rerupture.
Baltsavias et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: