This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We present an analysis of the mid-infrared emission lines for a sample of 12 low-metallicity blue compact dwarf (BCD) galaxies based on high-resolution observations obtained with Infrared Spectrograph on board the Spitzer Space Telescope. We compare our sample with a local sample of typical starburst galaxies and active galactic nuclei (AGNs) to study the ionization field of starbursts over a broad range of physical parameters and examine its difference from the one produced by the AGN. The high-ionization line [O iv]25.89 μm is detected in most of the BCDs, starbursts, and AGNs in our sample. We propose a diagnostic diagram of the line ratios [O iv]25.89 μm/[S iii]33.48 μm as a function of [Ne iii]15.56 μm/[Ne ii]12.81 μm which can be useful in identifying the principal excitation mechanism in a galaxy. Galaxies in this diagram split naturally into two branches. Classic AGNs as well as starburst galaxies with an AGN component populate the upper branch, with stronger AGNs displaying higher [Ne iii]/[Ne ii] ratios. BCDs and pure starbursts are located in the lower branch. We find that overall the placement of galaxies on this diagram correlates well with their corresponding locations in the log([N ii]/Hα) versus log([O iii]/Hβ) diagnostic diagram, which has been widely used in the optical. The two diagrams provide consistent classifications of the excitation mechanism in a galaxy. On the other hand, the diagram of [Ne iii]15.56 μm/[Ne ii]12.81 μm versus [S iv]10.51 μm/[S iii]18.71 μm is not as efficient in separating AGNs from BCDs and pure starbursts. Our analysis demonstrates that BCDs in general do display higher [Ne iii]/[Ne ii] and [S iv]/[S iii] line ratios than starbursts, with some reaching values even higher than those found at the centers of AGNs. Despite their hard radiation field though, no [Ne v]14.32 μm emission has been detected in the BCDs of our sample.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hao et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: