This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study tested whether audio-synchronized inertial motion capture can produce measurable improvements in gesture–sound communication in higher-education conducting instruction. Eighteen conducting students at Shenyang Conservatory of Music (China) completed a randomized, pretest–posttest protocol comparing motion-capture-assisted training with traditional instruction, using blocked randomization within expertise strata and concealed allocation. Motion-capture-assisted training produced clear advantages. The beat–sound interval shortened by ∼29 ms within the intervention group, with a between-group advantage of ∼24 ms. Gesture size–loudness coupling strengthened by 0.28, tempo variability decreased by ∼13 ms, and smoothness increased substantially. Expert evaluations rose by ∼9 points on a seven-item rubric. A dose–response pattern was observed: greater session engagement was associated with larger timing gains.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng Sun (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: