Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Twelve renal homotransplantation donors were interviewed in depth between five weeks and 18 months after surgery. Unexpected findings were (1) the decision-making process about donorship did not at all follow a pattern compatible with the concept of "informed consent" but occurred as an instantaneous, irrational response which subsequently was justified and maintained with the aid of a number of defensive techniques; and (2) the prevalent idea that the organ donor makes a major sacrifice without getting anything of significance in return was not true for our subjects who looked back upon it not as a disruptive, but as an integrative experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carl H. Fellner (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: