Why the study?
Oral rotavirus vaccines underperform in low-and-middle income countries, creating a need for improved immune correlates of protection and novel evaluation strategies.
Does the absence of fecal vaccine shedding after a second dose of oral rotavirus vaccine predict a decreased risk of rotavirus diarrhea in infants?
Does the absence of fecal vaccine shedding after a second dose of oral rotavirus vaccine predict a decreased risk of rotavirus diarrhea in infants?
Absence of fecal shedding after a second dose of oral rotavirus vaccine may serve as a marker of mucosal immunity and predict protection against rotavirus diarrhea.
Absence of fecal shedding after dose 2 was associated with lower RVA diarrhea risk; leaves open CHIM utility for CoP discovery in larger prospective studies.
Group A rotaviruses (RVA) remain a leading cause of pediatric diarrhea worldwide, in part due to underperformance of currently approved live-attenuated, oral vaccines in low-and-middle income countries. Improved immune correlates of protection (CoP) for existing oral vaccines and novel strategies to evaluate the performance of next-generation vaccines are needed. Use of oral vaccines as challenge agents in controlled human infection models is a potential approach to CoP discovery that remains underexplored. In a live-attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccine (Rotarix, GlaxoSmithKline) efficacy trial conducted among infants in Dhaka, Bangladesh, we explored the potential for the second dose of the two-dose series to be considered a challenge agent through which RVA immunity could be explored, using fecal virus shedding post-dose 2 as a marker of mucosal immunity. Among 180 vaccinated infants who completed the parent study per protocol, the absence of fecal vaccine shedding following the second dose of Rotarix suggested intestinal mucosal immunity generated by the first dose and a decreased risk of RVA diarrhea through 2 years of life (RR 0.616, 95% CI 0.392-0.968). Further development of controlled human infection models for group A rotaviruses, especially in prospective studies with larger sample sizes, may be a promising tool to assess rotavirus vaccine efficacy and CoPs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: