Why the study?
Successful reperfusion is the goal of primary PCI in STEMI, and the association between the De Ritis ratio (AST/ALT) and myocardial reperfusion remained to be investigated.
Does a high De Ritis ratio predict poor myocardial reperfusion in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI?
Does a high De Ritis ratio predict poor myocardial reperfusion in STEMI patients undergoing pPCI?
The De Ritis ratio (AST/ALT) is an easily obtainable biomarker that strongly predicts poor myocardial reperfusion in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI.
De Ritis ratio may flag reperfusion risk after pPCI in STEMI; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Successful reperfusion of myocardial tissue is the goal of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to investigate the association between the De Ritis ratio (AST/ALT) and myocardial reperfusion in patients with STEMI who underwent pPCI. We retrospectively investigated 1236 consecutive patients who were hospitalized for STEMI and underwent pPCI. ST-segment resolution (STR) was defined as the return of the deviated ST-segment to baseline; poor myocardial reperfusion was defined as <70% STR. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the median De Ritis ratio (.921); 618 patients (50%) were assigned to the De Ritis low group while 618 patients (50%) were assigned to the De Ritis high group. Stent size, neutrophil-to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the De Ritis ratio found to be associated with poor myocardial reperfusion (Odds ratio (OR) 1.45, 95% CI 1.07–1.98, P = .01, OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01–1.48, P = .03 and OR 10.9, 95% CI 7.9–15, P < .001, respectively). A high De Ritis ratio was associated with poor myocardial reperfusion in STEMI patients who underwent pPCI. As an easily obtainable test in clinical practice, the De Ritis ratio may help identify patients at major risk for impaired myocardial perfusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şengör et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: