Key result
Unhealthy body fat percentage was associated with 15-year all-cause mortality, whereas BMI had no significant relationship.
Why the study?
Does body fat percentage better predict 15-year mortality risk compared to body mass index in young adults?
Cohort
Does body fat percentage better predict 15-year mortality risk compared to body mass index in young adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Body fat percentage and waist circumference are superior to BMI for predicting 15-year all-cause and heart disease mortality in young adults.
ABSTRACT PURPOSE Body mass index (BMI) is the current standard body composition measurement. We examined BMI vs body fat percentage (BF%) for 15-year mortality risk among adults aged 20-49 years. METHODS In this nationally representative cohort of US adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Cox proportional hazard regression was computed for 15-year mortality risk. Healthy and overweight/obese BMI were 18.5-24.9 and ≥25 kg/m², respectively. The unhealthy BF% and waist circumference (WC) thresholds were ≥27% and ≥44%, and >40 and >35 inches, for men and women, respectively. The 15-year mortality risk for BMI, BF%, and WC was computed. RESULTS Body fat percentage and WC are both significantly associated with 15-year, allcause mortality (BF%: unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.01; 95% CI, 1.45-2.78; P < .001; adjusted HR 1.78; CI, 1.28-2.47; P < .001; WC: unadjusted HR 1.94; CI, 1.38-2.72; P < .001; adjusted HR 1.59; CI, 1.12-2.26; P = .009) and heart disease mortality (BF%: unadjusted HR 4.20; CI, 1.94-9.11; P < .001; adjusted HR 3.62; CI, 1.55-8.45; P = .003; WC: unadjusted HR 4.75; CI, 2.45-9.21; P < .001; adjusted HR 4.01; CI, 1.94-8.27; P < .001). Body mass index has no statistically significant relationship with all-cause mortality. Body mass index has a significant association with heart disease mortality in the unadjusted model but not in the adjusted model. CONCLUSION Body fat percentage is a better predictor of 15-year mortality risk factor in young adults than BMI. A move to using BF% rather than BMI may change how we measure body composition for risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mainous et al. (2025) reported a cohort. Unhealthy body fat percentage (BF%) vs. Healthy body fat percentage was evaluated on 15-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.28-2.47, p=< .001). Unhealthy body fat percentage was associated with 15-year all-cause mortality, whereas BMI had no significant relationship.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: