Why the study?
Does apheresis improve outcomes in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does apheresis improve outcomes in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
This review highlights the potential of apheresis as an effective treatment for idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, driven by an autoimmune mechanism, while emphasizing the need for further research.
Apheresis should not yet change practice in idiopathic DCM; leaves open optimal patient selection and technique for prospective trials.
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) causes significant morbidity and mortality and is the number one indication for cardiac transplantation in the United States. A large percentage of cases of DCM have no identifiable cause with evidence suggesting that these may represent an autoimmune disorder triggered by viral myocarditis. There is a growing body of literature suggesting that a number of immunoadsorption techniques, as well as plasma exchange, may have a role in the treatment of idiopathic DCM. The hypothesized autoimmune mechanism behind idiopathic DCM as well as the published evidence for the use of apheresis in this disorder are reviewed. The available evidence suggests that apheresis may be an effective treatment, but additional research is needed to identify markers that will predict response and the most effective apheresis technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeffrey L. Winters (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: