Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In recent times, rubberized concrete (RubCrete) has been considered a sustainable solution to address various issues associated with the environmental impacts of the waste rubber (WasRub) sourced from end-of-life tires. Though this strategy professes sustainable development goals (SDGs) associated with WasRub disposal, the question is what characteristics of the RubCrete surpass those of conventional concrete. To address this issue, the present study was conducted with the objective of providing insights into the viability and effectiveness of utilizing WasRub and how it impacts the overall properties of RubCrete. With this in view, extensive destructive and nondestructive tests (e.g., compressive strength, density, slump, rebound hammer, ultrasonic pulse velocity, nanoindentation) were conducted on the samples of the control and different WasRub compositions of the RubCrete. The results so obtained were analyzed to highlight the changes that the inclusion of WasRub makes to the complex concrete matrix, by investigating the microstructure of the RubCrete through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), nanoindentation, and four-dimensional (4D) X-ray microscopy. These investigations reveal the microscopic details related to the distribution and interaction of WasRub within the RubCrete matrix and the interfacial transition zone (ITZ). It was observed that the thickness of the ITZ lies between 5.18 and 60.45 μm. Furthermore, the role and influence of the ITZ on the macrocharacteristics of RubCrete were investigated elaborately in this paper by utilizing the mentioned characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: