Why the study?
Fatigue is a debilitating symptom lacking effective therapy, prompting the need to assess fatigue levels and associated factors among patients with a permanent cardiac pacemaker.
What are the levels of fatigue and associated factors among patients with a permanent cardiac pacemaker?
What are the levels of fatigue and associated factors among patients with a permanent cardiac pacemaker?
Patients with permanent pacemakers experience moderate to low levels of fatigue, which is exacerbated by factors such as female sex, lower education, anxiety, and lack of information about their device.
Fatigue screening may be considered in female and lower-educated pacemaker patients; hypothesis-generating for prospective interventional studies.
Introduction Fatigue is a debilitating symptom of subjective nature which lacks effective therapy. The aim of the study was to assess levels of fatigue and the associated factors among patients with permanent cardiac pacemaker (PCM). Material and methods This was a cross-sectional study carried out in Athens. The study sample consisted of 250 patients with a PCM. Results Data indicated moderate to low levels of fatigue. Furthermore, women (median: 24, p = 0.001), those with primary school education (median: 21, p = 0.001), those who were “a little-not at all” informed about PCM (median: 31, p = 0.001), those who had someone to help them in daily activities (median: 23, p = 0.001), those who did not believe that PCM solved their cardiac problem (median: 36, p = 0.001), and those who did not believe that their quality of life was improved (median: 35, p = 0.001) had high levels of fatigue. Moreover, high levels of fatigue were felt by those who characterized themselves as anxious and those who reported to be very anxious about their heart rate and the proper function of PCM (medians: 21.5, 25 and 25 respectively). Additionally, more fatigue was felt by participants who did not smoke after implantation and did not exercise at all (medians: 20 and 24 respectively). Finally, older patients felt more fatigue (rho = 0.248) while the later the implantation device was inserted the more fatigue the patients felt (rho = 0.274). Conclusions The present results will help clinicians to acquire an in-depth knowledge of factors associated with fatigue after implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polikandrioti et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: