Why the study?
Does aerobic interval training improve myocardial function in sedentary seniors?
Does aerobic interval training improve myocardial function in sedentary seniors?
Aerobic interval training for 12 weeks partially reverses age-related decline in diastolic function and improves exercise systolic function in healthy sedentary seniors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May improve diastolic function in sedentary seniors; hypothesis-generating, requires RCTs before practice change.
OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of aerobic interval training (AIT) on myocardial function in sedentary seniors compared to master athletes (MA) and young controls. DESIGN: Sixteen seniors (72 ± 1 years, 10 men) performed AIT (4 × 4 minutes) at ≈ 90% of maximal heart rate three times per week for 12 weeks. Results were compared with 11 male MA (74 ± 2 years) and 10 young males (23 ± 2 years). RESULTS: Seniors had an impaired diastolic function compared to the young at rest. AIT improved resting diastolic parameters, increased E/A ratio (44%, p <0.01), early diastolic tissue Doppler velocity (e') (11%, p <0.05) and e' during exercise (11%, p <0.01), shortened isovolumic relaxation rate (IVRT) (13%, p <0.01). Left ventricle (LV) systolic function (S') was unaffected at rest, whereas S' during stress echo increased by 29% (p <0.01). Right ventricle (RV) S' and RV fractional area change (RFAC) increased (9%, p <0.01, 12%, p =0.01, respectively), but not RV e'. MA had the highest end-diastolic volume, stroke volume, diastolic reserve and RV S'. CONCLUSION: AIT partly reversed the impaired age related diastolic function in healthy seniors at rest, improved LV diastolic and systolic function during exercise as well as RV S' at rest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molmen et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: