Atlantic Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus) aquaculture has developed rapidly in recent years, making it necessary to discriminate between specimens derived from aquaculture (captive-reared) and those derived from fisheries (wild-caught). In this study, a method based on the chemical composition of discard tissues (gills and bones) in 3 batches of juvenile T. thynnus (tank-cultured on land, cage-reared in the sea, and wild-caught) was assessed. The concentrations of 11 macro- and micro-elements (i.e., Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, P, S, Cu, Mn, Zn, and Sr) were determined and evaluated using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 2 multivariate tests, namely a principal component analysis (PCA) and discriminant canonical analysis (DCA). The best results were obtained from the gills and from the batch corresponding to the wild-caught specimens. However, the results were not robust enough to establish any specific pattern that would facilitate the identification of the origin of T. thynnus specimens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Salvat-Leal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: