Why the study?
Contrast-induced nephropathy is an important complication associated with adverse outcomes that has been mainly studied in cardiac procedures, despite also occurring after non-cardiac vascular interventions.
What are the risk factors, consequences, and preventive strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing non-cardiac vascular procedures for aortic aneurysm and carotid stenosis?
What are the risk factors, consequences, and preventive strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing non-cardiac vascular procedures for aortic aneurysm and carotid stenosis?
This narrative review highlights the importance of recognizing and preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in non-cardiac vascular procedures such as those for aortic aneurysm and carotid stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Raises CIN awareness beyond cardiac procedures; leaves open dedicated prevention trials in non-cardiac vascular interventions.
Contrast-induced Nephropathy (CIN) is animportant complication of iodinated Contrast Medium (CM) administration, being associated with both short- and long-term adverse outcomes (e.g., cardiorenal events, longer hospital stay and mortality). CIN has been mainly studied in relation to cardiac procedures but it can also occur following non-cardiac vascular interventions. This is Part 1 of a narrative review summarizing the available literature on CIN after non-cardiac vascular diagnostic or therapeutic procedures for aortic aneurysm and carotid stenosis. We discuss the definition, pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, biomarkers and consequences of CIN in these settings, as well as preventive strategies and alternatives to limit iodinated CM use. Physicians and vascular surgeons should be aware of CM-related adverse events and the potential strategies to avoid it. Clearly, more research in this important field is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raffort et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: