Key result
This narrative review summarizes the incidence, biomarkers, risk factors, consequences, and prevention strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with peripheral artery disease or renal artery stenosis.
Why the study?
What are the incidence, risk factors, consequences, and prevention strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing non-cardiac vascular procedures for PAD or RAS?
What are the incidence, risk factors, consequences, and prevention strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing non-cardiac vascular procedures for PAD or RAS?
This narrative review summarizes the current evidence on contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing procedures for peripheral artery disease and renal artery stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid CIN risk assessment in PAD procedures; leaves open need for prospective prevention trials.
This is Part 2 of a narrative review summarizing the literature on CIN after non-cardiac vascular diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, focusing on Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD) and Renal Artery Stenosis (RAS). Part 1 discussed CIN in relation to aortic aneurysms and carotid stenosis. We comment on the incidence, biomarkers, risk factors and consequences of CIN in patients with PAD or RAS, as well as on strategies to prevent CIN. Future perspectives in the field of CIN in relation to non-cardiac vascular procedures are also considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raffort et al. (2021) conducted a review in Contrast-induced Nephropathy in Peripheral Artery Disease and Renal Artery Stenosis. Contrast media in non-cardiac vascular procedures was evaluated on Incidence, biomarkers, risk factors and consequences of CIN. This narrative review summarizes the incidence, biomarkers, risk factors, consequences, and prevention strategies for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with peripheral artery disease or renal artery stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: