Why the study?
Emergency exploratory laparotomy carries significant postoperative morbidity and mortality, prompting the investigation of prognostic indices such as the APACHE II score and CRP/albumin ratio to predict outcomes.
Do the APACHE II score and CRP/albumin ratio predict morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy?
Do the APACHE II score and CRP/albumin ratio predict morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing emergency exploratory laparotomy?
The CRP/albumin ratio and APACHE II score are both highly effective predictors of 30-day morbidity and mortality following emergency exploratory laparotomy.
May aid risk stratification after emergency laparotomy; leaves open need for prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Exploratory laparotomy in emergency setting is associated with significant post-operative morbidity and mortality. Several prognostic indices have been developed to predict the outcomes. The present study investigated the APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) score and C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio as predictors of morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent emergency exploratory laparotomy at a tertiary-care hospital. Methods One hundred consecutive patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were enrolled. The APACHE II score and CRP/albumin ratio were calculated. Post-operatively, all complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) and deaths within 30 days of surgery were observed. Comparison of the receiver operating characteristic curve was performed to compare the area under the curve (AUC) of APACHE II and CRP/albumin ratio in predicting complications and mortality. Results The APACHE II score ≥13 predicted major complications with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 81%. The CRP/albumin ratio ≥5.1 was found to predict major complications with a sensitivity and specificity of 95% and 93%, respectively. The AUC for the APACHE II Score and CRP/albumin ratio in predicting major complications was 0.946 and 0.97, respectively (p <0.001), thus demonstrating excellent diagnostic performance. Conclusion We found that the better parameter in terms of AUC is the CRP/albumin ratio, although statistically there was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of the two parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Siwach et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: