Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare unenhanced and contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging with other sequences to visualize meningeal carcinomatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unenhanced FLAIR images were compared with spin echo T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced FLAIR images in five patients with documented meningeal carcinomatosis and four patients with suspected meningeal carcinomatosis. Comparisons were also made between contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and FLAIR images. RESULTS: In six patients, the unenhanced FLAIR images showed areas of abnormal hyperintensity within the sulci that were not noted on the spin-echo T2-weighted images. In all patients, the contrast-enhanced FLAIR images also showed meningeal enhancement, periventricular enhancement, or both. The contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and FLAIR images were equivalent in their depiction of abnormal enhancement in five of the nine patients; contrast-enhanced FLAIR images were superior in three patients. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced FLAIR images are of more value than spin-echo T2-weighted images for the diagnosis of intracranial meningeal carcinomatosis. Contrast-enhanced FLAIR images can sometimes surpass contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images in their quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsuchiya et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: