Why the study?
To evaluate right ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunctions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic control using layer-specific global longitudinal strain and strain rate.
Does layer-specific global longitudinal strain and strain rate detect right ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic control compared to normal controls?
Does layer-specific global longitudinal strain and strain rate detect right ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic control compared to normal controls?
Layer-specific global longitudinal strain and strain rate can effectively detect subclinical right ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.
Layer-specific RV strain may flag subclinical dysfunction in poorly controlled T2DM; leaves open prognostic value and therapeutic implications.
BACKGROUND: In order to evaluate right ventricular (RV) systolic and diastolic dysfunctions in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with poor glycemic control by layer specific global longitudinal strain (GLS) and strain rate (GLSr). METHODS: 68 T2DM patients and 66 normal controls were enrolled for the present study. RV layer specific GLS (GLSEpi, GLSMid and GLSEndo represent the epimyocardial, middle layer and endomyocardial strains, respectively) and GLSr (GLSr-S, GLSr-E and GLSr-A represent the systole, early-diastole and late-diastole strain rate) were calculated by averaging each of the three regional peak systolic strains and strain rates along the entire RV free-wall (RVFW), entire RV free-wall and septal wall (RVFSW) on RV-focused view. RESULTS: The absolute values of RV layer specific GLS (GLSEpi, GLSMid and GLSEndo) in RVFW in T2DM patients were significantly lower than normal controls (P < 0.01), while GLSr-A was significantly larger than normal controls (P < 0.001). The absolute values of RV layer specific GLS (GLSEpi and GLSMid) in RVFSW in T2DM patients were significantly lower than normal controls (P < 0.05), while GLSr-A was significantly larger than normal controls (P < 0.001). HbA1c were poor negatived correlated with GLSEpi in RVFW and RVFSW in T2DM patients (P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that RV layer specific GLS and GLSr-A had a high diagnostic efficacy in T2DM patients, and GLSr-A in RVFSW have the best diagnostic value in RV diastolic function in T2DM patients (AUC: 0.773). CONCLUSION: From the research, we found that layer specific GLS and GLSr could detect the RV myocardial dysfunctions and confirmed that the impaired RV systolic and diastole functions in T2DM patients with poor glycemic control. GLSr-A in RVFSW had the best diagnostic value in evaluating RV diastolic function in T2DM patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: