Why the study?
Does symptomatic mitral valve prolapse impair coronary microvascular function, and is this impairment related to ischemic-like ECG changes during exercise?
Does symptomatic mitral valve prolapse impair coronary microvascular function, and is this impairment related to ischemic-like ECG changes during exercise?
Coronary microvascular function may be impaired in patients with symptomatic mitral valve prolapse, but this impairment is not associated with the presence of ischemic-like ECG changes during exercise.
Symptomatic MVP may involve microvascular dysfunction independent of exercise ECG changes; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The purpose of the present study was to determine whether coronary microvascular function is impaired in patients with symptomatic mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and whether ischemia-like ECG, if present, is related to coronary microvascular dysfunction. Twenty chest pain patients with normal coronary angiograms and MVP proven by echocardiogram were included. Both treadmill exercise test (TET) and coronary hemodynamic study were done in each patient. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was determined by measuring coronary sinus flow (CSF) or great cardiac venous flow (GCVF) both at baseline and after dipyridamole 0.56 mg/kg IV for 4 minutes (maximum). All patients were divided into 2 groups with either negative (TET-) or positive results of TET (TET+). Another 10 subjects with atypical chest pain, normal coronary angiograms, echocardiogram and TET were used as controls. There were no differences in GCVF, either at baseline or after dipyridamole infusion, among the 3 groups. Calculated CFR using GCVF was similar among the 3 groups. However, baseline CSF was higher in the TET+ group (TET- vs TET+ vs control: 77 +/- 24 vs 96 +/- 31 vs 75 +/- 12 ml/min, p < 0.05) and maximum CSF was lower in the TET- group (TET- vs TET+ vs control: 167 +/- 25 vs 219 +/- 85 vs 238 +/- 80 ml/min, p < 0.05). Calculated CFR using CSF was significantly reduced in both the TET- (2.26 +/- 0.4) and TET+ groups (2.31 +/- 0.7) as compared with the control subjects (3.18 +/- 0.95, p < 0.01). There were no differences in any of the hemodynamic parameters between the TET- and TET+ groups. Coronary microvascular function could be impaired in patients with symptomatic MVP. Such impairment, when presented, was probably regional and outside the territory of the left anterior descending coronary artery. However, it was irrelevant to the presence of ischemic-like ECG during exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: