Why the study?
Does radionuclide imaging of the left ventricle reliably assess left ventricular function compared to standard contrast angiograms?
Population
Normal volunteers and patients
Comparison
Radionuclide imaging of the left ventricle vs Standard contrast angiograms
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
May support non-invasive LV assessment; confirms validation data but leaves open outcome trials before routine use.
Does radionuclide imaging of the left ventricle reliably assess left ventricular function compared to standard contrast angiograms?
Radionuclide imaging is a reliable, non-invasive method for assessing left ventricular function at rest and during exercise.
Pitt et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: